What Form Of Government?
Which is better, the Presidential form of government like in the US or the Parliamentary form of government like in UK? Please explain your point of view.
SO MANY ROADS
Which One To Choose?
Click here for the answer
THIS IS THE ROAD LEAST TRAVELED
THE ROAD TO ETERNAL LIFE
My Purpose In Life
"TO LIVE IN ORDER TO PLEASE GOD" (1 Thessalonians 4:1)
"So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God." (1 Corinthians 10:31)
Points of View (Discussion Blog)
This is your blog. I ask the question, you supply the answers. You can give your points of view on the topics discussed here.
4 comments:
OOPS! A little complex. Presidential form is rigid, strict, inflexible. But it keeps more order, I mean, with presidential government, there's more discipline, so it keeps more order, I mean, people is more straight.
So I choose presidential.
Let me tell you something: Presidential governmet is less than the form my Mother educated me and my Brother, 'cause she was (and is still) kind of a dictator. And dictatorship was more powerful, more rigid and strict than the presidential government. So I and my Brother are like soldiers.
So I'm comfortable with presidential government.
Big greetings and big hugs
Sweet Dreams, from the bottom of my Heart:
Arthur
Hi Mel, I choose parliamentary form of government. I heard it's more flexible than presidential government.
This world would happier than as it is now. Everyone could make their own laws to live in a better place.
Everyone could have more freedom (but not licentiousness) to do what they want to do, to do what they to do.
You know there are some injustices with presidential government (and a dictatorship is worse) that cannot be changed easily. So in the parliamentary governmet, id something is not very satisfactory, anyone can change it with more ease than the presidential government.
So I choose parliamentary government.
Greetings and hugs
Nice Day, with my whole soul:
Gusthav
Hi Arthur,
Yes, you want a Presidential form of government like that in the United States. It is more stable and rigid because the only time you can kick out a seating Prsident is by impeachment. Thanks for your point of view my young friend. God bless you and your family always.
Hi Gusthav,
There you are my young friend. You are again opposed to the point of view of your friend- Arthur. Well, the Parliamentary form of government like that in the United Kingdom has more flexibility and it is easier to change government just by a vote of no confidence to the Prime Minister. Ministers are also accountable for their actions since they too, like the Prime Minister, are elected by the voting populace.
The disadvantage is that there is less flexibility since a government can easily be changed by a vote of no confidence. Hence we see the spectacle of changing governments almost every year. There may be no continuity in policies. Thanks for your visit my young friend. God bless you and your family always.
Post a Comment